Updated:
Formal status
Do we sell here?
No.
Outlook
Timeline
May 2012
Vrhovno sodišče RS, Sklep X Ips 17/2012: "Navedene določbe dajejo jasen odgovor, da je promet s substanco, ki je opredeljena v seznamu iz Uredbe, prepovedan ne glede na obliko in količino, v kateri je dana v promet, razen v zakonsko določenih primerih." The judgment's own footnote cites I Ips 157/2008 and I Ips 158/2008 (27 November 2008) and I Ips 138/2006 (28 June 2007) for the proposition that any cannabis listed in the decree is a prohibited drug regardless of THC content. Note: the decision is a sklep rejecting revision as inadmissible, and was decided when cannabis sat in Skupina I.
Vrhovno sodišče RS, ECLI:SI:VSRS:2012:X.IPS.17.2012November 2019
Uredba o razvrstitvi prepovedanih drog (Ur. l. RS 69/19), adopted 21 November 2019, published 22 November 2019 and in force 7 December 2019, places cannabis in Skupina II at entry 112: "KONOPLJA — Cannabis sativa L. — ekstrakti / rastlina / smola". The entry carries no THC threshold and no quantitative carve-out. Made under ZPPPD, whose article 7(2) permits Group II trade only for medical, veterinary, teaching and scientific-research purposes and whose article 10(1) requires ministerial authorisation. Amended through Ur. l. RS 157/20, 162/21, 8/23, 113/23, 50/25 and 92/25 without change to entry 112 beyond a footnote cross-referring to ZKMZN.
Uradni list RS št. 69/2019February 2020
Višje sodišče v Mariboru, Sodba II Kp 5584/2016, in a cross-border online drug-sales case: "iz katere države in v katero državo je bila droga dostavljena, pa ni odločilna, saj je prodaja prepovedane droge izvršena že s sporazumom med kupcem in prodajalcem glede količine in cene in se za izvršitev zakonskih znakov kaznivega dejanja tudi ne zahteva, da je bilo blago izročeno kupcu", applying the territoriality principle and the ubiquity theory in KZ-1 article 19. On this reasoning a foreign seller's exposure crystallises when the order is accepted, not when the parcel is dispatched.
Višje sodišče v Mariboru, ECLI:SI:VSMB:2020:II.KP.5584.2016November 2020
The Court of Justice of the European Union gives judgment in C-663/18 (Kanavape), holding that a Member State may not prohibit the marketing of CBD lawfully produced in another Member State where it is extracted from the Cannabis sativa plant in its entirety. Slovenia's Health Inspectorate records the judgment in its 2020 annual report as a "prelomna sodba", and its 2019 CBD inspection campaign does not resume in any subsequent reporting year.
Court of Justice of the European Union, C-663/18August 2025
Zakon o konoplji za medicinske in znanstvene namene (ZKMZN, Ur. l. RS 60/25), published 5 August 2025 and in force 20 August 2025. Article 2(6) defines cannabis for medical purposes to include "ekstrakte iz konoplje… ne glede na vsebnost tetrahidrokanabinola (THC), kot tudi… ostali kanabinoidi naravnega izvora". Article 3(1) excludes the plant and its parts grown from catalogue varieties for food and industrial purposes, but not extracts. Article 2(16) redefines import to expressly include inbound movement "iz držav članic Evropske unije", abandoning ZPPPD's customs-territory anchor. It repeals and amends nothing in ZPPPD.
Uradni list RS št. 60/2025June 2026
ZIRS orders a recall of "CBD kapljice, 1000 mg, 10 %" (Agrosloven z.o.o., Golnik; distributed by Be Healthy d.o.o., Šenčur), triggered by a RASFF notification, on the ground that "prisotnost THC (292,5 mg/kg) v zadevnem prehranskem dopolnilu, lahko predstavlja tveganje za zdravje ljudi". Both producer and distributor are Slovenian-established. The objection was the THC content, not the CBD or the product's novel-food status — and a Slovenian producer had been openly selling a 10% CBD oral supplement until this point.
Zdravstveni inšpektorat RS — Nevarni in neskladni izdelki